At any rate, here are some pointers, again based on past experience. And, again, not a complete list...
- Answer the question, not the question you've imagined based on the keywords that you’ve picked out of a question that you haven't read thoroughly.
- Unless prompted to do so avoid first-person assertions. The question is not about your opinions, beliefs, or feelings. The question is about what is evident in or readable from the work.
- If you make an assertion, back it up with specific evidence from a work of art.
- Rhetorical questions are useless. Actual answers are useful.
- Description is never a substitute for interpretation. A pathway to interpretation, yes, but not a substitute. The “how” and “what” of an object’s making are important, but must be paired with the “why” and “with what effect, to what end, or with what influence.”
- Talk about the work, not around it.
- Don’t be clever. Be correct. Be complete.
0 comments:
Post a Comment